Friday, April 22, 2011

[GHHF] Ayodhya verdict is similar to – “you grab it, we legitimize it” Meeting to discuss the Verdict on Saturday (October 2) at 4:00 pm in Dallas and 5 other cities


[GHHF] Ayodhya verdict is similar to – “you grab it, we legitimize it” Meeting to discuss the Verdict on Saturday (October 2) at 4:00 pm in Dallas and 5 other cities

10/1/2010

When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.  Edmund Burke

         Three Judge bench of Allahabad court of Lucknow Bench in a majority decision ruled on Thursday that Ram was born at the spot and that his idol should remain there. The verdict states unequivocally that the disputed site is the birthplace of Ram. The court's observation that the "disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Muslims."  In its judgment court says that it was built over a destroyed temple.

         Justice S U Khan said let the land be divided in three parts, one each for the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party representing Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha – the party for Lord Ram. Khan said the area where Ram's idol is should be given to Hindus. Muslims to be given a separate portion of the courtyard, and third litigant Nirmohi Akhara another section of the courtyard.

         The Courts itself contracted itself in making the judgment. It agreed that the “disputed site” was the birthplace of Lord Rama. If that is the case, how can the Court say that they divide the land into three parts and distribute it to three groups?
It is a sketchy, patchy, fearful, instigated, illegal, arbitrary, political, and appeasement judgment. It has crossed it’s legal boundaries of jurisdiction.

         First of all the judgment is surprising and astonishing because of the fact that none the plaintiffs has asked for the division of the land into three parts. Court clearly went beyond it’s jurisdiction. The decision is more of political nature to appease the Muslims than a legal, rational, logical decision. This unprecedented ruling is going to pave the way for others to ask for legitimacy of occupying all the Hindu Temples that were converted into masjids. This decision has more implications for the usurpation of Hindu Lands and Hindu Temples. It should be challenged on the ground that no plaintiff has asked for the division and also that the court went beyond it’s legal nature of the case. It should not take a political decision on the issues.

         What the Allahabad High Court said is that “you grab Hindu lands and demolish Hindu Temple, we will legitimize it.” The court said we will follow the government policy of “you grab it, we regularize it.”  Can any body find the difference between the Court’s judgment and political appeasement?

         Please join the discussion group to express your views on the verdict – whether it is favorable to Hindus or not on this Saturday.

         Global Hindu Heritage Foundation is organizing meetings to discuss about the implications of this verdict in the following cities in USA:

1) Dallas, Texas
           Meeting Details:
                         Date:               October 2, 2010 (Saturday)
                        Time                4:00 pm
                         Place:              L.E.R. Schimelpfenig Library
                                                5024 Custer Road, Plano TX 75023
                                                972.769.4200

                                     TV9 is expected to cover the discussion.

2) Chicago, Illinois
              Contact:        Prasad Yalamachi for the time and date
                            630-418-1122
3) New Jersey
              Contact:       Satya for details

4) Orlando, Florida
              Contact: Bharat at 407-970-5511

5) Raleigh, North Carolina
              Contact:  Raju at   919-303-0247    

 ENCOURAGE:
          Please encourage all your friends  to attend these meetings closer to their place 
                 
Allahabad Court Judgment

The essence of the judgment is to divide the Rama Janmabhumi to be divide into three portions as follows:
1) Central Portion of Temple Area where murties are installed - Rama Lalla

2) Platform and Kitchen Area - Nirmohi Akhara

            3) Area where both both Hindus and Moslems had been worshipping                                     together for many decades – Muslims.

Link to the Judgment

            You can visit the website to get more detailed information:
                     http://rjbm.nic.in/

Attachmnents

            You can also look at the four documents – all from the court. Please read and digest.

Visit  us online:
http://www.savetemples.org
http://www.globalhinduheritagefoundation.org

No comments:

Post a Comment